The midterm election turned out to be of little real consequence to Virginia state government. I have just returned from Richmond, where, over tea party objections, we repaired the serious damage inflicted on the McDonnell Transportation Program during the first part of the 2014 legislature session. I refer to the “first part” of this session because we have not yet adjourned this year. Rather, Republicans have found a creative way to prevent executive action by Governor McAullife after adjournment. This year we recess instead of adjourn. Remember the creative offer made to Democratic Senator Puckett to encourage his resignation from the seat in his Republican-leaning district. Republicans claimed a Senate majority following the election to fill the open seat.
In my humble opinion, Republicans should not be celebrating victory, nor Democrats mourning defeat based on these mid-terms. Clearly, the overwhelming majority this year was apathetic. I am mystified by the confidence displayed by the media, their designated pundits and legions of politicians in discerning what the election results mean.
To me, what they mean is that when you pare down the electorate to fewer than 4 out of 10 registered voters, you enhance the power the voters who the merely angry: those who feel exploited, disrespected and abused by a black president; or those who feel insulted by sanctimonious politicians who undermine women’s reproductive health care choices; or those who feel disgusted by the massive waste of life and treasure as America attempts to rescue a non-compliant world. The repulsive ads dominating the airwaves this fall reflect the fact that negative ads are the tools of choice when you’re trying to motivate angry voters.
Why do politicians not focus more on non-voters? For Republicans, I think the reason is clear: the lower the turnout, the higher the probability that their angry voters will prevail. What’s more, the essence of Republican strategy for a generation has been to make government the problem.
They dismantle government through program and funding cuts and then run against it when it fails to work. Governance by subtraction. Many talented, hard-working people advocate this view. Some of these emerge from humble origins, but disproportionately, they come from relatively comfortable backgrounds.
For Democrats, the problem is far more complex. To appeal to non-voters, Democrats have to define an agenda that offers real value. Then, they have to deliver. A successful Democratic agenda would reduce the disparity of wealth and income that the current system perpetuates. Those at the top would lose some of their relative advantage. Programs intended to have this effect – such as Obamacare – inevitably face vehement opposition.
For Democrats these mid-term results should underscore the fact that we must not and, in fact, cannot play an angry voter strategy. Ours is a longer game that must begin with clearly articulating our values: community, equal opportunity, public investment, competent governance, accountability and the environment, among others. We need to put forth programs that have been proven effective and to fund them at levels that will produce tangible results. Our programs will certainly require increased revenues. Tax reform must be on the agenda, as will a substantial increase in funding for public education – especially pre-K and technical training – for infrastructure investment and for an overhaul of the criminal justice system.
I am a proud advocate for a progressive, Democratic agenda. But, I understand that Democrats must not perpetuate and/or create government programs or government bureaucracies for their own sake, or to protect public unions. Democrats must be driven by actual performance based on business metrics, as we were, for example, under Mark Warner’s term as Governor.
During his 2001 election campaign, he put forth a strong, positive agenda for his term. Such an agenda did not seem to be a key driver of his senatorial re-election campaign. I do not know if a more positive campaign would have produced a better election result. However, I am confident that this is the way forward for Democrats over the long term.
Delegate Kory represents the 38th District in the Virginia House of Delegates. She may be emailed at DelKKory@house.virginia.gov.
From the Front Row: Kaye Kory’s Richmond Report
Kaye Kory
In my humble opinion, Republicans should not be celebrating victory, nor Democrats mourning defeat based on these mid-terms. Clearly, the overwhelming majority this year was apathetic. I am mystified by the confidence displayed by the media, their designated pundits and legions of politicians in discerning what the election results mean.
To me, what they mean is that when you pare down the electorate to fewer than 4 out of 10 registered voters, you enhance the power the voters who the merely angry: those who feel exploited, disrespected and abused by a black president; or those who feel insulted by sanctimonious politicians who undermine women’s reproductive health care choices; or those who feel disgusted by the massive waste of life and treasure as America attempts to rescue a non-compliant world. The repulsive ads dominating the airwaves this fall reflect the fact that negative ads are the tools of choice when you’re trying to motivate angry voters.
Why do politicians not focus more on non-voters? For Republicans, I think the reason is clear: the lower the turnout, the higher the probability that their angry voters will prevail. What’s more, the essence of Republican strategy for a generation has been to make government the problem.
They dismantle government through program and funding cuts and then run against it when it fails to work. Governance by subtraction. Many talented, hard-working people advocate this view. Some of these emerge from humble origins, but disproportionately, they come from relatively comfortable backgrounds.
For Democrats, the problem is far more complex. To appeal to non-voters, Democrats have to define an agenda that offers real value. Then, they have to deliver. A successful Democratic agenda would reduce the disparity of wealth and income that the current system perpetuates. Those at the top would lose some of their relative advantage. Programs intended to have this effect – such as Obamacare – inevitably face vehement opposition.
For Democrats these mid-term results should underscore the fact that we must not and, in fact, cannot play an angry voter strategy. Ours is a longer game that must begin with clearly articulating our values: community, equal opportunity, public investment, competent governance, accountability and the environment, among others. We need to put forth programs that have been proven effective and to fund them at levels that will produce tangible results. Our programs will certainly require increased revenues. Tax reform must be on the agenda, as will a substantial increase in funding for public education – especially pre-K and technical training – for infrastructure investment and for an overhaul of the criminal justice system.
I am a proud advocate for a progressive, Democratic agenda. But, I understand that Democrats must not perpetuate and/or create government programs or government bureaucracies for their own sake, or to protect public unions. Democrats must be driven by actual performance based on business metrics, as we were, for example, under Mark Warner’s term as Governor.
During his 2001 election campaign, he put forth a strong, positive agenda for his term. Such an agenda did not seem to be a key driver of his senatorial re-election campaign. I do not know if a more positive campaign would have produced a better election result. However, I am confident that this is the way forward for Democrats over the long term.
Delegate Kory represents the 38th District in the Virginia House of Delegates. She may be emailed at DelKKory@house.virginia.gov.
Recent News
Guest Commentary: The Tariff Inflation That Wasn’t and Why the Story Isn’t Over
By Dr. Stanley Nollen On April 2nd 2025, newspaper readers were greeted with headlines like this one: “Trump Imposes 10%
Will Davis Reaches 1,000 Points As Meridian Boys Beat Brentsville 70-41
Meridian High School boys’ basketball head coach Jim Smith recalls the first time he ever met Will Davis, when the
The Post & Kennedy Center ‘Die in Daylight’
Comes the terrible news this week that many saw coming weeks ago if not longer: Washington Post billionaire owner Jeff
Gabbard, Trump & Moscow
Today, the world stands speechless and with mouths agape at the latest news of the veritable demise, or next stage
Shakespeare Theatre’s ‘Paranormal Activity’ Delivers Terror
We sat on the edge of our seats, waiting, waiting, waiting for the bad to come: We didn’t know where
Our Man In Arlington 2-5-2026
It has been said that the most difficult task in the public eye is related to “snowstorms and school superintendents.”
Stories that may interest you
Guest Commentary: The Tariff Inflation That Wasn’t and Why the Story Isn’t Over
By Dr. Stanley Nollen On April 2nd 2025, newspaper readers were greeted with headlines like this one: “Trump Imposes 10% Baseline Tariff Rate on All Imports, and Higher Rates for
Will Davis Reaches 1,000 Points As Meridian Boys Beat Brentsville 70-41
Meridian High School boys’ basketball head coach Jim Smith recalls the first time he ever met Will Davis, when the future senior captain was in seventh grade. “He was a
The Post & Kennedy Center ‘Die in Daylight’
Comes the terrible news this week that many saw coming weeks ago if not longer: Washington Post billionaire owner Jeff Bezos has moved to decimate that once-great newspaper, firing a
Gabbard, Trump & Moscow
Today, the world stands speechless and with mouths agape at the latest news of the veritable demise, or next stage of “slow killing,” as U.S. Rep. Don Beyer put it,