WASHINGTON — The war in Iraq is the issue in the critical Nov.7 election — and it should be.
Although they are not on the ballot, President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney are running scared, with Bush warning that the Democratic approach means that "the terrorists win and America loses."
It’s a rare opportunity to weigh in on the nation’s foreign policy and to send a message to the president who led the country into an unnecessary war.
This is also a chance for the voters to assess the political fate of the do-nothing rubber-stamp Congress, where lawmakers failed to question the president’s motives in creating the Iraqi disaster.
The majority of Democrats on Capitol Hill went along with the October 2002 resolution which the administration took as the go-ahead for the invasion and occupation of the oil-rich country.
Democrats can’t complain, but they can see the light and change their minds. They might even be able to propose an exit date and escape being accused by GOP opponents of not supporting the troops — despite Bush’s desperate rhetoric — since some Republicans are looking for a way out of the quagmire, too.
Other Republican candidates seem to be shying away from the war issue as they put some distance between themselves and Bush. Many aren’t eager for the traditional side-by-side public appearances with the president.
Senate Majority leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said last week that Republican candidates should steer clear of the war in Iraq and get Americans focusing on pocketbook issues.
Not all are taking that advice.
Rep. David Dreier, R-Calif., said in a recent column in the Christian Science Monitor that while "the struggle (meaning the war) is incredibly difficult, the Republican approach is working for America."
Karl Rove, the White House political adviser, has been urging party candidates to stick with the tried-and-true emphasis on national security and the war on terrorism, promising it would play well at the polls.
The president also has thrown in a last-minute diatribe against gay marriage.
To take over Capitol Hill and turn Bush into a real lame duck, Democrats need to win 15 seats in the House and six in the Senate.
In a mid-term correction to help beleaguered Republican candidates, Bush has now rejected the slogan "stay the course" that he and his top advisers had used to flay the Democrats, whom they accused of wanting to "cut and run."
The administration also has been talking loudly about benchmarks and timetables to assure voters that there is some movement toward an Iraq exit strategy.
Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki denies there is any deal on timing of withdrawal of American troops and dismissed such talk as a campaign ploy for U.S. domestic consumption.
Bush told ABC-TV’s George Stephanopoulis on "This Week" on Oct. 22: "We’ve never been ‘stay the course,"’ a claim that smoothly ignored repeated statements by the president and other administration officials over the past three years.
The election is not only a referendum on the war but also on the administration’s waning credibility.
Helen Thomas: The Vote Will Be On The War
Helen Thomas
WASHINGTON — The war in Iraq is the issue in the critical Nov.7 election — and it should be.
Although they are not on the ballot, President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney are running scared, with Bush warning that the Democratic approach means that "the terrorists win and America loses."
It’s a rare opportunity to weigh in on the nation’s foreign policy and to send a message to the president who led the country into an unnecessary war.
This is also a chance for the voters to assess the political fate of the do-nothing rubber-stamp Congress, where lawmakers failed to question the president’s motives in creating the Iraqi disaster.
The majority of Democrats on Capitol Hill went along with the October 2002 resolution which the administration took as the go-ahead for the invasion and occupation of the oil-rich country.
Democrats can’t complain, but they can see the light and change their minds. They might even be able to propose an exit date and escape being accused by GOP opponents of not supporting the troops — despite Bush’s desperate rhetoric — since some Republicans are looking for a way out of the quagmire, too.
Other Republican candidates seem to be shying away from the war issue as they put some distance between themselves and Bush. Many aren’t eager for the traditional side-by-side public appearances with the president.
Senate Majority leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said last week that Republican candidates should steer clear of the war in Iraq and get Americans focusing on pocketbook issues.
Not all are taking that advice.
Rep. David Dreier, R-Calif., said in a recent column in the Christian Science Monitor that while "the struggle (meaning the war) is incredibly difficult, the Republican approach is working for America."
Karl Rove, the White House political adviser, has been urging party candidates to stick with the tried-and-true emphasis on national security and the war on terrorism, promising it would play well at the polls.
The president also has thrown in a last-minute diatribe against gay marriage.
To take over Capitol Hill and turn Bush into a real lame duck, Democrats need to win 15 seats in the House and six in the Senate.
In a mid-term correction to help beleaguered Republican candidates, Bush has now rejected the slogan "stay the course" that he and his top advisers had used to flay the Democrats, whom they accused of wanting to "cut and run."
The administration also has been talking loudly about benchmarks and timetables to assure voters that there is some movement toward an Iraq exit strategy.
Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki denies there is any deal on timing of withdrawal of American troops and dismissed such talk as a campaign ploy for U.S. domestic consumption.
Bush told ABC-TV’s George Stephanopoulis on "This Week" on Oct. 22: "We’ve never been ‘stay the course,"’ a claim that smoothly ignored repeated statements by the president and other administration officials over the past three years.
The election is not only a referendum on the war but also on the administration’s waning credibility.
Recent News
Paragon Theaters Host Grand Opening Ribbon Cutting
Guests at the gala grand opening of the state of the art Paragon Theaters in downtown City of Falls Church
From NYC to FC: ‘The Materialists’ Lights Up Paragon Theaters
By Lisa Sinrod Are you in the mood for a summer rom com? This romantic comedy released in theaters nationwide
Arena Stage’s Smashing Musical, ‘A Winkle in Time,’ Going Places
I have a friend who said she read Madeleine L’Engle’s sci-fi novel, “A Wrinkle in Time,” as a book-wormish 10-year-old
Our Man In Arlington 6-26-2025
The local protests for “No Kings Day” on June 14 might go down in Arlington history as one of the
News-Press Expansion Will Benefit All in City
Our colleagues at the online ArlNow news site reported on our chief’s presentation to the Falls Church City Council last
A ‘Peace Through Fusion’ Alternative to Global War
How about proposing to any and all nations harboring nuclear fission based weapons of mass destruction that they trade them
Stories that may interest you
Paragon Theaters Host Grand Opening Ribbon Cutting
Guests at the gala grand opening of the state of the art Paragon Theaters in downtown City of Falls Church were treated at an impressive ribbon cutting tonight. They took
From NYC to FC: ‘The Materialists’ Lights Up Paragon Theaters
By Lisa Sinrod Are you in the mood for a summer rom com? This romantic comedy released in theaters nationwide on June 13 features a high-end professional Matchmaker, her many
Arena Stage’s Smashing Musical, ‘A Winkle in Time,’ Going Places
I have a friend who said she read Madeleine L’Engle’s sci-fi novel, “A Wrinkle in Time,” as a book-wormish 10-year-old when it was published in 1961 and claims it was
Our Man In Arlington 6-26-2025
The local protests for “No Kings Day” on June 14 might go down in Arlington history as one of the biggest one-day demonstrations within Arlington’s borders, if not the biggest.