Incumbent Falls Church City Councilman Lawrence Webb, seeking re-election this spring, distinguished himself, in our view, from six other candidates running when all appeared at the monthly luncheon of the Falls Church Chamber of Commerce Tuesday.
Webb was the only one of the seven willing to stand up and state explicitly that he will advocate and fight for a more substantial salary increases for City employees than is currently proposed.
The candidates were asked to respond to concerns that a “brain drain” threatens the quality of public services and the school system in Falls Church because data is showing surrounding jurisdictions weighing in with far more substantial salary hikes now that there are signs of recovery from the recent deep recession.
For all intents and purposes, with the budget currently proposed by City Manager Wyatt Shields, Falls Church city employees are facing a fourth straight year with no net increase in take-home pay. On top of that, they face a still-greater burden to provide a share of pension and health insurance benefits, and are tasked with providing the services the public has come to expect despite an over 10 percent decrease in the size of the City’s workforce.
The candidates at Tuesday’s luncheon all gave generalized lip service or obfuscated the issue as one comparing the zero-growth City employee salary plan with a one-step (3 percent) salary increase for school employees, which is really only 2 percent when measured against a 1 percent increase in their cost of retirement insurance.
The question dealt not with comparables between the City’s school and municipal employees, but was in the context of the larger reality of what surrounding jurisdictions are offering. On top of that, Falls Church continues to be unaffordable for most City, or private sector for that matter, employees because of a lack of affordable housing.
The combination promises to only accelerate the flight of quality employees from both the City school and municipal workforces. Already in the last year, the City lost some very key employees who took with them not only their talents and expertise, but their substantial institutional history of Falls Church.
While the are a lot of factors to balance in the shaping of this spring’s $69 million budget, there are growing questions about some of its priorities. Two of the most central ones deal with debt. On the one hand, the City has decided that it needs to keep two months’ worth of annual operating expenses sitting in the bank, not one month as was its earlier policy. Second, the City has very limited plans to borrow, even though the current plans keep it below half the level its own policies would support, and this is being done when interest rates are at record lows (they won’t be forever).
Bottom line, Wall Street, the nation’s most discredited institution, is pressuring Falls Church to adopt austerity. It is being done at a terrible cost to the City.
Editorial: Wall Street Vs. City Employees
FCNP.com
Incumbent Falls Church City Councilman Lawrence Webb, seeking re-election this spring, distinguished himself, in our view, from six other candidates running when all appeared at the monthly luncheon of the Falls Church Chamber of Commerce Tuesday.
Webb was the only one of the seven willing to stand up and state explicitly that he will advocate and fight for a more substantial salary increases for City employees than is currently proposed.
The candidates were asked to respond to concerns that a “brain drain” threatens the quality of public services and the school system in Falls Church because data is showing surrounding jurisdictions weighing in with far more substantial salary hikes now that there are signs of recovery from the recent deep recession.
For all intents and purposes, with the budget currently proposed by City Manager Wyatt Shields, Falls Church city employees are facing a fourth straight year with no net increase in take-home pay. On top of that, they face a still-greater burden to provide a share of pension and health insurance benefits, and are tasked with providing the services the public has come to expect despite an over 10 percent decrease in the size of the City’s workforce.
The candidates at Tuesday’s luncheon all gave generalized lip service or obfuscated the issue as one comparing the zero-growth City employee salary plan with a one-step (3 percent) salary increase for school employees, which is really only 2 percent when measured against a 1 percent increase in their cost of retirement insurance.
The question dealt not with comparables between the City’s school and municipal employees, but was in the context of the larger reality of what surrounding jurisdictions are offering. On top of that, Falls Church continues to be unaffordable for most City, or private sector for that matter, employees because of a lack of affordable housing.
The combination promises to only accelerate the flight of quality employees from both the City school and municipal workforces. Already in the last year, the City lost some very key employees who took with them not only their talents and expertise, but their substantial institutional history of Falls Church.
While the are a lot of factors to balance in the shaping of this spring’s $69 million budget, there are growing questions about some of its priorities. Two of the most central ones deal with debt. On the one hand, the City has decided that it needs to keep two months’ worth of annual operating expenses sitting in the bank, not one month as was its earlier policy. Second, the City has very limited plans to borrow, even though the current plans keep it below half the level its own policies would support, and this is being done when interest rates are at record lows (they won’t be forever).
Bottom line, Wall Street, the nation’s most discredited institution, is pressuring Falls Church to adopt austerity. It is being done at a terrible cost to the City.
Recent News
Senator Saddam Salim Richmond Report
U.S. Strikes in Iran: the Urgent Need for Congressional Oversight On June 21st, President Trump abruptly attacked Iranian nuclear facilities
Beyer Floor Remarks Opposing H.R. 1
July 3, 2025 (Washington, D.C.) – Congressman Don Beyer (D-VA) this morning delivered the following remarks on H.R. 1, aka the One
Beyer, Simon Speak at Tri-Branch NAACP Town Hall
On Saturday, June 28, Congressman Don Beyer and Virginia Delegate Marcus Simon were among the panelists for a Town Hall
A Penny for Your Thoughts 7-3-2025
Growing up in post-World War II America presented few options for young women past high school. College graduates could aspire
Cult Century: 1970s Roots Of Trumpism, Part 7 of 25
The U.S. Senate approval this week has been of perhaps the most heinous bill ever, stealing from the poor to
Rev. M. Davies Kirkland Says Thank You City of Falls Church
byThe Rev. M. Davies Kirkland Pastor, Dulin United Methodist Church (Ed. Note – The Rev. Kirkland’s 25 year ministry at
Stories that may interest you
Senator Saddam Salim Richmond Report
U.S. Strikes in Iran: the Urgent Need for Congressional Oversight On June 21st, President Trump abruptly attacked Iranian nuclear facilities with American bombers. The next day, he abruptly announced a
Beyer Floor Remarks Opposing H.R. 1
July 3, 2025 (Washington, D.C.) – Congressman Don Beyer (D-VA) this morning delivered the following remarks on H.R. 1, aka the One Big Ugly Bill Act, during debate on the measure: “From
Beyer, Simon Speak at Tri-Branch NAACP Town Hall
On Saturday, June 28, Congressman Don Beyer and Virginia Delegate Marcus Simon were among the panelists for a Town Hall hosted by the NAACP branches in Fairfax, Arlington, and Alexandria.
A Penny for Your Thoughts 7-3-2025
Growing up in post-World War II America presented few options for young women past high school. College graduates could aspire to be elementary school teachers or nurses but, once married,