Nearly three years ago, the bipartisan 9/11 Commission submitted its 41 recommendations to Congress on how to better protect America from terrorism.
Unfortunately, during the next two and a half years, the former GOP-led Congress failed to enact many of these recommendations into law. Indeed, in December 2005, the 9/11 Commissioners gave the GOP-led Congress poor grades on their implementation of the commission’s recommendations, including 5 F’s, 12 D’s, 9 C’s, and 2 Incompletes.
By contrast, implementing the remaining 9/11 Commission recommendations has been a top priority of the new Democratic-led 110th Congress. The first bill that the House passed this year was H.R. 1, the 9/11 bill, and the Senate passed its version in March.
Both the House and Senate bills contain strong provisions to better protect America from terrorism. They include better screening of aircraft cargo, beefing up efforts to prevent WMD from falling into terrorist hands, enhancing first responder communications interoperability, and strengthening public diplomacy to reduce the appeal of extremism at home and overseas.
This week, an unclassified version of the latest National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) — prepared by the National Intelligence Council, a coordinating body for the opinions of the 16 U.S. intelligence agencies – was released. It states that Osama bin Laden’s al Qaeda network has been able to restore key capabilities for launching another attack on U.S. soil. And, according to three top U.S. intelligence officials, al-Qaeda has rebuilt its headquarters in Pakistan and is more dangerous than at any time since the Sept. 11 attacks.
While this information first raises the question of why, nearly six years after 9/11 and two wars later, al Qaeda is still a major threat, it also makes clear how crucial it is that we enact these stalled recommendations post haste.
The House and Senate plan to go to conference committee this week to iron out differences between the two chambers’ bills. These differences are thought to be relatively minor and agreement is expected to be reached in short order.
Enactment of the conference report on H.R. 1 will be one of the key achievements of the 110th Congress. This Congress is committed to taking the steps necessary to fight terrorism and protect the homeland from attack. The blue ribbon 9/11 panel put considerable effort into coming up with their recommendations. It is our duty to see that these security-enhancing proposals are taken from the shelf, dusted off and enshrined into law.
Jim Moran
Nearly three years ago, the bipartisan 9/11 Commission submitted its 41 recommendations to Congress on how to better protect America from terrorism.
Unfortunately, during the next two and a half years, the former GOP-led Congress failed to enact many of these recommendations into law. Indeed, in December 2005, the 9/11 Commissioners gave the GOP-led Congress poor grades on their implementation of the commission’s recommendations, including 5 F’s, 12 D’s, 9 C’s, and 2 Incompletes.
By contrast, implementing the remaining 9/11 Commission recommendations has been a top priority of the new Democratic-led 110th Congress. The first bill that the House passed this year was H.R. 1, the 9/11 bill, and the Senate passed its version in March.
Both the House and Senate bills contain strong provisions to better protect America from terrorism. They include better screening of aircraft cargo, beefing up efforts to prevent WMD from falling into terrorist hands, enhancing first responder communications interoperability, and strengthening public diplomacy to reduce the appeal of extremism at home and overseas.
This week, an unclassified version of the latest National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) — prepared by the National Intelligence Council, a coordinating body for the opinions of the 16 U.S. intelligence agencies – was released. It states that Osama bin Laden’s al Qaeda network has been able to restore key capabilities for launching another attack on U.S. soil. And, according to three top U.S. intelligence officials, al-Qaeda has rebuilt its headquarters in Pakistan and is more dangerous than at any time since the Sept. 11 attacks.
While this information first raises the question of why, nearly six years after 9/11 and two wars later, al Qaeda is still a major threat, it also makes clear how crucial it is that we enact these stalled recommendations post haste.
The House and Senate plan to go to conference committee this week to iron out differences between the two chambers’ bills. These differences are thought to be relatively minor and agreement is expected to be reached in short order.
Enactment of the conference report on H.R. 1 will be one of the key achievements of the 110th Congress. This Congress is committed to taking the steps necessary to fight terrorism and protect the homeland from attack. The blue ribbon 9/11 panel put considerable effort into coming up with their recommendations. It is our duty to see that these security-enhancing proposals are taken from the shelf, dusted off and enshrined into law.
Share:
More Posts
America at 250: Its Next 250 Years
As we celebrate our first 250 years, here are some thoughts on what the next 250 years for the U.S. may bring: The next 250 years will likely transform the
Movie Review: Young Washington
The timing could not be more fitting for Angel Studios’ July 3rd release of a historical drama centered on the formative years of a founding father. The PG-13 film features
A Penny for Your Thoughts 7-9-2026
The disclosure last week that Donald Trump’s family increased its wealth by $1.4 billion in 2025, largely through the dubious cryptocurrency market, was stunning in its dollar amount, but not
America at 200, When I First Met Reagan
The next 50 years? I am old enough to vividly recall 50 years ago when the U.S. celebrated its 200th anniversary. It was 1976 and I was living in San
Send Us A Message