The Iraq Study Group (ISG) released its long-awaited report on Iraq two weeks ago, calling the situation, “grave and deteriorating.” As expected, the ISG’s recommendations contrasted dramatically with the views of the President and his administration.
A ten member bipartisan panel, the ISG (also known as the Baker-Hamilton Commission) was commissioned by Congress in March 2006. Tasked with reviewing the administration’s handling of the Iraq war and offering recommendations on how to end the conflict, the commission was able to find consensus on a package of 79 separate recommendations that veer drastically from the President’s long-standing "stay the course" policy.
Most of the ISG’s 79 recommendations are not new. Many have been advanced by foreign policy experts and members of Congress. But as a package with the imprimatur of some of the most respected figures in American foreign policy and government, the recommendations carry substantial weight.
Since release of the ISG report, the President has finally acknowledged we are not winning in Iraq and that a new direction in Iraq is necessary. He appears, however, to be shunning the ISG’s recommendations. Instead of focusing on the best ways to extract our forces from Iraq, the President is reported to be ready to call for an immediate surge of American troops in Iraq in the range of 20,000-30,000.
More troops in Iraq won’t make a difference if their mission remains undefined. More troops only means more U.S. servicemen and women caught in the crossfire of a bloody Iraqi civil war, not greater stability for the country. General Abizaid, head of Central Command in Iraq, has said that expanding the number of American troops merely puts off the day when Iraqis are forced to take responsibility for their own security. In the General’s own words, "The Baghdad security situation requires more Iraqi troops."
The U.S. now spends over $2 billion per week in Iraq. To date, nearly 3,000 lives and over $400 billion have been lost to this conflict. Next month, the President will request an additional $160 billion to fund military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. This will provide the new Democratically-controlled Congress with an opportunity to gain some control over the funding and direction for the war in Iraq.
BY JOHN F. CROWNOVER Every eight hours, Virginia loses someone to suicide. In 2023, 1,230 Virginians died by suicide, and nearly four out of five were men. They were fathers,
Is it too early to raise the specter of condemnation, otherwise known as a taking or the exercise of eminent domain, in the cases facing the City of Falls Church
I love living in Falls Church. One thing that sets us apart from other cities is our strong sense of community. We have lots of events that bring us all
Jim Moran
The Iraq Study Group (ISG) released its long-awaited report on Iraq two weeks ago, calling the situation, “grave and deteriorating.” As expected, the ISG’s recommendations contrasted dramatically with the views of the President and his administration.
A ten member bipartisan panel, the ISG (also known as the Baker-Hamilton Commission) was commissioned by Congress in March 2006. Tasked with reviewing the administration’s handling of the Iraq war and offering recommendations on how to end the conflict, the commission was able to find consensus on a package of 79 separate recommendations that veer drastically from the President’s long-standing "stay the course" policy.
Most of the ISG’s 79 recommendations are not new. Many have been advanced by foreign policy experts and members of Congress. But as a package with the imprimatur of some of the most respected figures in American foreign policy and government, the recommendations carry substantial weight.
Since release of the ISG report, the President has finally acknowledged we are not winning in Iraq and that a new direction in Iraq is necessary. He appears, however, to be shunning the ISG’s recommendations. Instead of focusing on the best ways to extract our forces from Iraq, the President is reported to be ready to call for an immediate surge of American troops in Iraq in the range of 20,000-30,000.
More troops in Iraq won’t make a difference if their mission remains undefined. More troops only means more U.S. servicemen and women caught in the crossfire of a bloody Iraqi civil war, not greater stability for the country. General Abizaid, head of Central Command in Iraq, has said that expanding the number of American troops merely puts off the day when Iraqis are forced to take responsibility for their own security. In the General’s own words, "The Baghdad security situation requires more Iraqi troops."
The U.S. now spends over $2 billion per week in Iraq. To date, nearly 3,000 lives and over $400 billion have been lost to this conflict. Next month, the President will request an additional $160 billion to fund military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. This will provide the new Democratically-controlled Congress with an opportunity to gain some control over the funding and direction for the war in Iraq.
Share:
More Posts
Every Eight Hours: This September, Make Checking In a Habit
BY JOHN F. CROWNOVER Every eight hours, Virginia loses someone to suicide. In 2023, 1,230 Virginians died by suicide, and nearly four out of five were men. They were fathers,
The Fields: Eminent Domain Awaits
Is it too early to raise the specter of condemnation, otherwise known as a taking or the exercise of eminent domain, in the cases facing the City of Falls Church
Falls Church Forward Spreads Community Spirit in the Little City
I love living in Falls Church. One thing that sets us apart from other cities is our strong sense of community. We have lots of events that bring us all
The Fields: F.C.’s Latest Affordability Challenge
Just as the City of Falls Church is now fully engaged in the effort to dedicate 4.5 acres in the center of the city known as the Virginia Village for
Send Us A Message