Two public events in the City of Falls Church last weekend underscored a creeping sense of urgency associated with the future direction of the jurisdiction as we’re into the annual budget season, on the one hand, and regional pressures are impinging. The first was the five-hour planning session the City Council held in the Jefferson Elementary School library that included an invitation to participate that almost two dozen citizen leaders of volunteer advisory boards and commissions responded to. The second was a F.C. League of Women Voters forum on Sunday at the Community Center on how revenue is generated in the City to pay for things. It was also more heavily attended than expected for a bright weekend day.
While a lot of things were put on the table, our take-away centered on two ends of a wider socio-economic spectrum – the pressure for continued economically-driven development, on the one hand, and the need for a serious consideration of the affordable housing question on the other.
The word is going around Falls Church now that the City is in a pickle because the real estate taxes in neighboring Arlington are so much lower than in Falls Church, even as the City Council may be pressured to raise its rates here again this spring. It was notable in the Council planning session that “keeping the tax rate low” was not listed by any Councilman as a priority for the coming two years, and that may be because the simple answer to the Arlington comparison is to suggest citizens take a closer look at Arlington, and see the incredible density of commercial and retail that it has engendered over the years. That is the straightforward answer to the Arlington question, and in Falls Church this may mean that current height limits, at least in selected parts of town, may need to go considerably higher than considered feasible so far.
This goes for the City’s recently acquired campus property, the added 36 acres that is supposed to go mostly for new school facilities. There is no reason, other than what the market will bear, for any height limit to be observed there, at all, especially next to the West Falls Church Metro station.
On the affordable housing question, this is no longer simply an issue of altruistic good will. It is an absolute necessity for the government’s charge to serve the needs of its people. At the Council planning session, a survey of City staff showed the prevailing opinion that the City’s worst performance is in the area of affordability issues. Yet, no one on the Council listed it as a priority, until near the very end of the marathon session.
The affordable units now available at one of the City’s two new mixed use projects are flat-out unaffordable. Open to households with 80 percent of median regional incomes, their asking prices are astronomical. Affordability issues are flatly a question of political will.
FAIRFAX, VA — Governor Abigail Spanberger today signed a package of bipartisan legislation to tackle the high cost of healthcare, make prescription drugs more affordable, and ensure more Virginians have access
As expected, the Falls Church City Council moved through the final seven of its votes smoothly Monday night to adopt the Fiscal Year 2027 operating budget and six-year Capital Improvement
The following remarks were delivered at the conclusion of Monday’s Falls Church City Council vote on the Fiscal Year 2027 budget by F.C. Mayor Letty Hardi: “To echo my colleagues’
I am deeply disappointed in today’s ruling from the Supreme Court of Virginia. On a 4-3 partisan vote, the Court’s Republican majority chose politics over the rule of law, twisting
Editorial: Development & Affordable Housing
Editorial: Development & Affordable Housing
Two public events in the City of Falls Church last weekend underscored a creeping sense of urgency associated with the future direction of the jurisdiction as we’re into the annual budget season, on the one hand, and regional pressures are impinging. The first was the five-hour planning session the City Council held in the Jefferson Elementary School library that included an invitation to participate that almost two dozen citizen leaders of volunteer advisory boards and commissions responded to. The second was a F.C. League of Women Voters forum on Sunday at the Community Center on how revenue is generated in the City to pay for things. It was also more heavily attended than expected for a bright weekend day.
While a lot of things were put on the table, our take-away centered on two ends of a wider socio-economic spectrum – the pressure for continued economically-driven development, on the one hand, and the need for a serious consideration of the affordable housing question on the other.
The word is going around Falls Church now that the City is in a pickle because the real estate taxes in neighboring Arlington are so much lower than in Falls Church, even as the City Council may be pressured to raise its rates here again this spring. It was notable in the Council planning session that “keeping the tax rate low” was not listed by any Councilman as a priority for the coming two years, and that may be because the simple answer to the Arlington comparison is to suggest citizens take a closer look at Arlington, and see the incredible density of commercial and retail that it has engendered over the years. That is the straightforward answer to the Arlington question, and in Falls Church this may mean that current height limits, at least in selected parts of town, may need to go considerably higher than considered feasible so far.
This goes for the City’s recently acquired campus property, the added 36 acres that is supposed to go mostly for new school facilities. There is no reason, other than what the market will bear, for any height limit to be observed there, at all, especially next to the West Falls Church Metro station.
On the affordable housing question, this is no longer simply an issue of altruistic good will. It is an absolute necessity for the government’s charge to serve the needs of its people. At the Council planning session, a survey of City staff showed the prevailing opinion that the City’s worst performance is in the area of affordability issues. Yet, no one on the Council listed it as a priority, until near the very end of the marathon session.
The affordable units now available at one of the City’s two new mixed use projects are flat-out unaffordable. Open to households with 80 percent of median regional incomes, their asking prices are astronomical. Affordability issues are flatly a question of political will.
Share:
More Posts
NEW: Governor Spanberger Signs Bipartisan Bills to Cap Cost of Insulin, Lower Healthcare & Prescription Drug Costs
FAIRFAX, VA — Governor Abigail Spanberger today signed a package of bipartisan legislation to tackle the high cost of healthcare, make prescription drugs more affordable, and ensure more Virginians have access
F.C. Budget Adopted as Expected: Down 1/2c
As expected, the Falls Church City Council moved through the final seven of its votes smoothly Monday night to adopt the Fiscal Year 2027 operating budget and six-year Capital Improvement
Mayor Hardi on Budget: ‘This One Was Relatively Easy’
The following remarks were delivered at the conclusion of Monday’s Falls Church City Council vote on the Fiscal Year 2027 budget by F.C. Mayor Letty Hardi: “To echo my colleagues’
Del. Marcus Simon Weighs In On Virginia Court Decision
I am deeply disappointed in today’s ruling from the Supreme Court of Virginia. On a 4-3 partisan vote, the Court’s Republican majority chose politics over the rule of law, twisting
Send Us A Message